Regular Assignment

One of his duties is to operate as the coach for runners who hope to complete the New York City battle of Marathon. He himself has won several battle of Marathons and ultra- marathons runner locomote. Thus he is more inform ab protrude the usages and responsibilities of coach for the marathon runners. After the introduction of David, case bring drives us through understandings of how the complete manoeuvreing period of 16 weeks is carried out by athletes and runners. Initial 8 weeks he found it easy to train the runners.He was pleased looking the progress of the runners and had little difficulty in his role as coach. Some questions started to come in his mind regarding how to do his runners to touch out their goal. His issues of concern seemed quite different from those that he had expected to hear from new(prenominal) runners he antecedently trained for Marathons. Thus he divided runners and their concerns Into pastime three different classifys. The first group comprised of all staple questions with new joined runners who never had previous experiences.They kept on petition basic questions such as what to eat a day before marathon race, how much to drink and what kind of shoes to wear. The second group comprised of runners who had previously ran for marathons but were concerned round the effects of Davits raining on their running, cute to know the running mileage related to their affirmable marathon glossiness time. In addition their concern was to know whether consuming carbon-loading would improve their performances during the marathon.The tertiary group comprised of seasoned runners who roughlyly finished marathon in nip 10 of their respective divisions. These group too had some concerns related to timber flat and acted a bit moody and down about training. The most important concern they carried was whether Davits coaching would help them in other races likewise the New York City Marathon. Hint David should use the following leadershi p outline to train/coach his runners. The first group ineluctably David to make true that the runners will be motivated if they feel competent.Runners kept on consumeing questions such as what to eat a day before marathon race, how much to drink and what kind of shoes to wear. I think He needs to motivate the runners, make a diet plan and resolve their questions they have. But he should also take a none that not to instruct all of the runners in a single group. Based on runners abilities he should have different training sessions. Because may be the beginners (group ) would maintenance asking basic questions like which shoes to wear, what to eat in a session which might not be interest to groups 3.For them it would lead to boredom sessions of training and might remove interest from attending further sessions and from Marathon race too. So he should take note of all runners and base on knowledge should keep training. He could have taken training session where all questions and issues are addressed. The second group was concerned about the effects of Davits training on their running mileage related to their possible marathon finish time and forts reward they would buy off in picture after the marathon race.Running a marathon is a huge mess and if people are nervous or unsure they will ask a ton of questions. I think he should explain them the benefits they would get with the training. In addition he as a coach needs to be there for them and coach them to the finish line. He should reduce everyones sift when most seems nervous. Reassure the second group that they are doing great. The third group concern was not focused on current marathon race as objective by his training, but wanted to know if the tax return for their work valuable.David can motivate each of these groups by tending to the groups needs. function the beginners group questions, make a diet plan. A final critique that can be made of path- goal theory concerns a possible outcome of the theory. Path-goal theory suggests that it is important for leaders to provide coaching, guidance, and direction for subordinates, to help subordinates define and clarify goals, and to help subordinates around obstacles as they attempt to reach their goals. In effect, this approach treats leadership as a one government agency event. The leader affects the subordinate.