Sassoon vs Brooke

One, views on state of contend were vastly diametric amongst the population. The soldiers on the front line saw the piece through deferent eyes comp atomic number 18d to the people at home. Some attitudes were ground on experience and pain, whilst others on the Idea of patriotism and blind belief. They, by Serried Swanson, is a simple and direct poem decrying the by rightseous initiation sending men to die in a so-called baronial cause. Caissons bitterness against the state of contend is made clear through his poetry, which is filled with his jaundice against struggle, the futility of it and the high price that had to be paid.Swanson uses many different ways to extract his feelings, and particularly his bitterness and resentment to wards the war and the officers, but his true meanings are clear and he writes In such a way that shows intelligibly what he thinks and feels somewhat the war. The Bishop represents the pompous flag waiving establishment without a mite to the horrors of the battlefield. They are the boys at the front. The term they pass on not be the said(prenominal) Is Ironic and true. There Is the Inference that the boys will transcendInto some grace-Like state for having fought and sacrificed In a Just cause. Swanson knew the boys, those who survived, who would return home changed for far darker and haunting reasons. The elites racetrack the war thought nothing of sending troops to their cobblers lasts back and forth. The archetype sold to the populace back home was that it was the Just cause and it was a noble thing to have challenged death resulting in new right to breed an honorable race. The second stanza however is Caissons blunt and harsh pass of reality. It is a brief roll call of injury and sickness.Syphilis ran rampant among the boys loving random relationships and Swanson employs this as Illustration in mocking the Bishop as the disease Is hardly a righteous or noble means of death. The voices against the war c ry out Youll not find a chap whos served that hasnt comprise some change, and not In a good way. The last(a) line exposes the hypocrisy. The ways of God are strange is the blind ignorance of the excuses. Rupert Brooke overly wrote about war but in a much different light. He has a actually overbearing outlook on war and a very strong patriotic distinguish of England.In fact in The Soldier he praises the wonderful land of England (gave, once, her flowers to chi suffere, her ways to roam, A frame of Englands breathing English air). In contrast with Swanson, Brooke adopts a natural positive attitude think only of me as this That theres some corner of a foreign field. as a man who accepts that his survival is not guaranteed and death In defending his country would make him complete. The language apply reflects his feelings. He only ever uses one negative word, evil, and even this Is used in the context of universe shed away.It is almost an ode to England itself In that rich image-evoking language (her flowers to love, her ways to roam. ) The poem is a sonnet which is a style traditionally used by people writing love poetry. In this case Brooke is using the sonnet form to speak his love for his country. The break of thought allows the reader to have time to think about the poets run-in and absorb them in. The writer moves from one scene he is describing, England universe a trial creation of beauty (her flowers to love, her lands to roam), on to England being alive, personifying England (A pulse in the eternal mind).Yet there is a continuing presence of the importance and power of England, and this is shown by the use of words such as richer, blest by sun and English enlightenment. The form, structure and choice of language all work together. Brooks poems have been associated with the magisterial attitudes prevalent in the years leading up to 1914 and the outbreak of war in this sense, his poetry is actually re-war, unlike Caissons verse, which is during the war, and speaks less of ideals and more of realism. However, war is a common thread for all writers to use. As Swanson pointed out, there will always be war, and as long as there is war there will be someone to write about it. Poets express their protest or support through their writing. War poetry can also be a form of propaganda. Caissons was traditional propaganda opposing war while Brooks was a positive form of propaganda. Each man had very strong opinions based on their own personal experience.