How far is it applicable to management and employee motivation in contemporary Chinese organizations? Essay

critically evaluate McGregors surmise X and supposition Y. How far is it applicable to focussing and employee motivation in contemporary Chinese organizations? During the 1960s the act of psychologists invented motivational theories, which aimed to increase organizations productivity. One of those is McGregors hypothesis X and opening Y, in which he claimed that multitude can be managed in two extremes, based on the grounds of their needs.After publishing his work had a significant impact on c atomic number 18 ideas. Head (2011) states, that in get days, his approaches of management can be successfully applied in divers(prenominal) countries, as well as in China. However, de elicit the red-brickization of modern workings environment in China, there are still the reduce of potentships that make the adaptation of his theories complex and difficult. From the year of publication, McGregors work make a significant influence on the management philosophy. Most of the manageme nt books include his theory as an example of the substantial step of management insights (Jastolka, 2009). It was stated by Head (2011), that most of the managers prefer to use ace of those, instead of other approaches. Later, after McGregors publication the contribution for a deeper look into of labors motivation was made. Also, McGregors work persuaded managers to bank that employees behavior can be predicted using scientific methods. Afterwards the research has been conducted, therefore the deeper understanding of humans motivation can be gained (Head, 2011). The appliance of both methods can be successful, depending on which sphere the familiarity is specializing in.According to Bobic and Davis (2003), adaptive approach, or Theory X works with highly routine and detailed tasks. Additionally, it is more distract for firms with bureaucratic structures (Kirton, 1978 cited in Bobic and Davis, 2003). such(prenominal) organizations have hierarchical systems with clearly distingui shed responsibilities and roles. Regarding to the innovative technique, or Theory Y, it responds more efficiently with complicated tasks that require special skills (Sorensen, 2011). In spite of listed advantages, McGregors work was criticized for the number of weaknesses. Firstly, technological development, new forms of businesses and other improvements in the organization of production leaded to the alteration of employees responsibilities, and formed new types of line of descents. It was claimed by Bobic and Davis (2003), that present workers have varied working coterietings, in the comparison to the working environment in1960s.Thus, it is fallaciously to regard this theory as a sound explanation of contemporary humans motivation. Secondly, people have a set of characteristics, which makes every person unique, and it is far too complex to distinguish them betwixt only two groups. For example, Theory X does not take the salmagundi of individuals into the consideration (Miner, 2002 cited in Jastolka, 2009). Finally, McGregors hypothesis is mostly founded on Maslows hierarchy of needs, which validity is criticized (Heylighen, 1992 cited in Bobic and Davis, 2003).Furthermore, Maslows work was based on the empirical base of America, and its applicability to other countries has not been successfully turn out yet. In case of China, its working environment is slightly becoming kindred to Western, because in 1979 Chinese government began to implement economic policies to create an thriftiness with capitalistic features, such as profit orientation, private owning and market forces (Francesco and Gold, 2005). such(prenominal) changes significantly influenced the way, in which Chinese workers are treated by their managers, forcing them to give methods that used in Western nations, however despite these changes, implementing of McGregors methods is hard for certain reasons. First of all, according to Francesco and Gold (2005), the management style of a country, such as China, with strong traditions and remained patriarchy, is hard to be transformed or altered.For example, Garg and Ma (2005) conducted a research, which shows the difference between frameworks of organizations. The participants of survey were three groups of firms, with different introduction of non-Chinese executives, who use Western management approaches complete, partial and blank, and result shows a significant difference between these companies in most aspects of working conditions. In organizations with only Chinese executives, most of employees experience an unavailability of managers, lack of rise to be innovative and lack of support most of the time. However, it could be argued that the conditions set forth above could be associated with Theory X. Secondly, Chinese employees in firms function as a group where each member is working for the prosperity of the complete company (Francesco and Gold, 2005).This feature restrains the enthusiasm of workers to be innovati ve in their job in order to maximize the profit of his/her company, but coerce them to do their tasks conventionally, because employees are anxious to harm their firm, while Theory Y assumes that people must have more freedom. Then,Tsui et al. (cited in Huang, 2006), argue that communist political theory force Chinese employees to make efforts in their work to the favor of the commune. Finally, cod to the listed characteristics most of the Chinese managers use commune-based leadership style. This means that Chinese workers are mostly dependent on their command and thus it is more appropriate to implement the ideas of Theory X in Chinese organizations (Jackson and Bak, 1998 cited in Huang, 2006). However, an interrogate made by Jamal and Xie (1991), shows that satisfaction and motivation of employees are in subscribe relationship to managers level of participation.To sum up, both Theory X and Theory Y have been successfully adopted in Western and some of the developing countries. With regard to China, which economy type has changed only 30 long time before and traditional values of Chinese people remain fundamental, which in turn reduce the probability of prosperous adaptation of McGregors ideas. canvass both theories, Theory X is more applicable to China than Theory Y, because of traditional command-style of leadership. However, in spite of the number of successful implementations of these approaches in wholly Chinese organizations, with the goal to maximize the profit of a company, the applying of methods, which reflect the nature of a worker in China, who is different from the Western employee is preferable to McGregors work.